>> |
No. 187233
>>187194 >Why does Julie have to be specifically dark anyway?
She doesn't. It's a direction they could have gone in, and the title of the episode combined with her bit at the beginning of the episode and her racquetball match with her dad would have been a good lead-in to something a little juicier. But she certainly doesn't have to go dark, no.
>She's more about being stuck in the middle of a complicated situation that isn't as black and white as Kane or the Burners like to make it out to be,
How is it not black and white? Kane is genuinely evil, the Burners are completely good, and this episode, which was a good chance to show some shades of gray, did nothing to change that status quo. About as cut and dry as it gets.
>She's what humanizes Kane.
Humanizes him by the smallest amount that him having a daughter could humanize him.
>Kane doing stuff to help people instead of just talking about it would be something I guess,
Ayup.
>Despite her being a good person and him DEFINITELY not, they have a surprisingly good relationship (discounting that big secret.)
No, they don't. She apparently spends almost no time with him. At the start of the ep she said she wanted to see some evidence that her dad wasn't a monster. She got none, but oh well, that results in no change to the status quo that existed before this ep. There was no talk of "good ol' days." The way they talked it seems this is the first time she's ever confronted him about his actions, which doesn't suggest they're close enough to really speak their minds. It's not the worst relationship ever, he doesn't throw her in the dungeon for talking back, but it's certainly a missed opportunity. Having one of the heroes secretly be the villain's daughter could've led to a lot more.
>You're only thinking of development in terms of Deluxe's worldbuilding
Unless you're using "worldbuilding" in a very different sense from what I'm used to, I don't see how.
>Except they can be more than two dimensional without being "dark".
Can be. Aren't.
>Julie is, if anything, the least "dark" of the Burners.
Yup. That's how it seemed at first, and it looks like there's no intention of going beyond that. Mike is the cool one that feels vaguely bad about working for Kane (but then it turns out he never actually DID anything he should feel bad about, so he may as well cut the crap), Julie is bright and sunny and that's pretty much it, Chuck is a Shaggy that knows computers, Texas is funny and into Kung Fu, and Dutch... Dutch is Texas's straight man.
>simply make it so she'd think "maybe it wouldn't be so bad to bulldoze houses with people still in them."
Well the problem there is that Kane talks about building a utopia to keep people safe, but never does anything that rises about Snidely Whiplash level villainy. So she's never given anything else to react to. A bad guy genuinely trying to create "a better world" and going too far could be shown doing things that might fall more in the shades of gray range, but okie-doke, Captain Planet-level villainy it is.
>If you want someone who might be pushed to an extreme, there's better characters to look for,
I don't think the other characters show any more potential.
>>187201 >The title is a reference to Kane passing on the mantle to Julie.
That's not how the phrase "like father like son" is used. It's a phrase that implies two generations have some similarities in personality or what they're drawn to.
>Are we watching the same show?
Some of the early stuff hinted at a little depth. Kane talked as if he'd been betrayed by Mike, and as if they'd worked together for a while, Julie being Kane's daughter did seem like it had some potential, and the fact that Kane talked about making a "perfect city" instead of just wanting to conquer did make him look like there might be more to him than met the eye. But apparently Mike was only ever a cadet and never did anything under Kane to justify Kane's feeling of betrayal (or justify Mike's shame about his past), Julie's relationship with her father is fairly eh, and Kane is just a monster with no redeeming qualities (except stylishness).
I'm not saying the show is bad. It's good. Could've been much better. They're going with characterization on the level of the new Thundercats, or maybe Scooby Doo: Mystery Inc. But they're crafting a very stylish, funny, and action-packed show, and I always look forward to new eps. Just going "shoot, looks like a lot of the things that initially seemed to have potential actually didn't." Solid B show.
|