/baw/ General Discussion Archived Board plus4chan home [baw] [co/cog/jam/mtv] [coc/draw/diy] [pco/coq/cod] [a/mspa/op/pkmn] [Burichan/Futaba/Greygren]
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
Subject   (reply to 384344)
Password  (for post and file deletion)

Currently 0 unique user posts.

  • 08/21/12 - Poll ended; /cod/ split off as a new board from /pco/.

File 137875978319.jpg - (220.17KB , 960x720 , image.jpg )
384344 No. 384344
Fetish discussion thread. I don't know, I'm just interested in fetishes in general, even if I find some of them disgusting.

iPod has no relevant images, make sure to NSFW tag if you insist on posting examples.
Expand all images
>> No. 384357
Inappropriate images for fetish threads are my fetish.
>> No. 384358
I have some GIFs to make for this thread!

I'll throw together one or two of them and NSFW tag them.
>> No. 384379
almost getting caught but not getting caught
hidden in public
sub/dom switching
teacher/student roleplay
orgasm ruining/withholding
biting/oral fixation
cheating roleplay but not actual cheating

and others... but i can't think of them right now.
>> No. 384389
File 137879726475.jpg - (255.51KB , 1280x720 , fmffro9.jpg )
'tis a peculiar fetish, I must say.

This reminds me, I was actually thinking of making a sort of relevant .gif

Hmm, very interesting. Thanks for sharing.
>> No. 384392
File 137880527088.jpg - (45.17KB , 552x414 , KCGMp.jpg )
overused image macro relevant

I am only into softcore lesbian/straight IRL porn, and almost exclusively female-only cartoon porn, but I think with furry I am a lot more open.
>> No. 384393
Since I have never known the touch of an actual woman, my fetishes have left the realm of anatomical plausability a long time ago. You know, that typical hardcore hentai shit. Tentacles, large insertions, cum inflation, that sort of stuff.
>> No. 384398
File 137881664530.gif?nsfw - (156.05KB , 320x255 , 137072760650.gif?nsfw )
I really like body worship, especially of the feet and hands.
Which is weird, because feet and hands don't do anything for me on their own. I know hand fetishists and foot fetishists and I don't seem to fit into either of those categories, they seem to get inherently turned on by the body part; the hand fetishist says that if she holds someone's hand that's significantly bigger than hers, it just sort of slowly gets her going until she's practically squirming. That's not really how it goes for me. Same with feet.
But the idea of sucking on my lover's fingers, or licking their palm, or kissing my way from heel to toe is uh

On a related note: I have a hella oral fixation.

There's more but it mostly just gets a lot more embarrassing so eh.

Gif isn't really nsfw but may be kind of gross to some people so
>> No. 384427
Does it even count as a fetish if damn near everything is sexy to me? Scat/piss, furry and abuse are pretty much the only things that repulse me.

I guess one thing that's pretty constant is I want to kiss/lick/suck everywhere on a woman's body. And I always have a VERY strong preference for loving, passionate sex, though I dunno if that counts as a kink or not.

Possibly my biggest turn-on is imagining myself as a woman, specifically a lesbian. I used to really like the idea of cross-dressing, but I guess over time that faded out as the lesbian fantasy became more dominant.

I've been trying to get rid of the lesbian/girl fantasy though, because I actually started to get kinda depressed that it was something I would never get to experience. Fetishes and thoughts about sex or even thinking about relationships in general tend to make me pretty sad if I'm not horny, but the lesbian thing to an unusual extent.

I've heard that once people actually start getting laid, they get less fetishistic. Or at least, their fetishes tend to become the more acceptable ones. Is there any truth to that?
>> No. 384428
once i intentionally jerked it to tractors just to see if i could. turns out i can.
>> No. 384450
Furry actually made me realize not only am I bi, but I'm into BDSM.
>> No. 384451
What can be jerked to and what makes you want to jerk it are two different things.

My actual fetishes are pretty boring. Public, furry, shotacon, occasional bouts of guro, and dubious consent.
>> No. 384458
Mine are fairly tame.

Crossdressing guys. Shits just hot. Especially stockings. Shows off the legs.

Loud sex, just in general. None of that faking shit or Japanese screech owl stuff.

Phone sex. Shit is a turn on. It just is. I mean sexting is ok but nothing beats hearing another person moaning in your ear.

Bleeding too. Then again having and ex grinding into your lap while she goes to town on your shoulder with a knife leaves an impression.

Public stuff is a favorite too

The only freaky one is monstergirls.
>> No. 384460
File 13789539108.jpg - (215.25KB , 800x480 , 01-how-about-no-bear.jpg )
>Mine are fairly tame
>> No. 384461
>Crossdressing guys. Shits just hot. Especially stockings. Shows off the legs.

Here's a question for ya: do you like men in women's clothing who still look like men, or do you like men who are feminine enough to almost/actually pass as a girl aka traps? Both?

I ask because both actually seem to be fairly common fetishes on the internet, but people who like one almost never like the other. I don't think I've ever met a person who likes both. From what I've seen women generally prefer a crossdresser who looks like a man in a woman's clothes, while guys who like crossdressers usually want them to look as much like a woman as possible.
>> No. 384462
Ok maybe that ones a bit out there. To clarify I only get turned on by it happening to me. Otherwise nope, opposite reaction.
>> No. 384463
I lean towards the more feminine side. It looks kind of off if the guy is built honestly. I'd rather the guy not bother with the crossdressing then.
>> No. 384469
File 137899121129.jpg - (111.33KB , 400x474 , 1281907658538.jpg )
>I don't think I've ever met a person who likes both.

>> No. 384470
File 137899240217.png - (551.81KB , 600x872 , 1306448926726.png )
But I mostly enjoy "manly crossdressing" for the lulz.
>> No. 384471
>I don't think I've ever met a person who likes both
I like both, but the former is less a fetish and more of an aesthetic I simply enjoy.
>> No. 384475
I like both. I got got my ex heavily into crossdressing, and there was no mistaking he was 100% a man. Beard and everything. On the other hand I like pretty girls and pretty boys so pretty boys that look like pretty girls are 100% gr9 to me.

>can't bring myself to delete the photos even though i promised

It would be such a waste.
>> No. 384479
Seeing this many people are into crossdressing guys makes me feel a lot better about my desire to do it. My hope of finding a partner who likes me doing it doesn't seem so impossible now.

Your fetishes have given me new hope, so please, thank your genitals for me.
>> No. 384480
Crossdressing is a lot of fun, I had a girlfriend who used to be into complete role reversal which played nicely into my fetish for women in suits.

I am bisexual but I'm kinda weird about it, I like guys to be girly and women to be chubby and or muscular.
>> No. 384494
File 137907877968.png - (30.91KB , 298x279 , thanks_boner.png )
>thank your genitals for me

pic related

I'm looking forward to the day when "choice dressing" becomes more commonly acceptable for guys. Until then, best of luck to you.
>> No. 384518
File 137910437275.jpg?spoiler - (121.95KB , 541x720 , image.jpg?spoiler )
>be me when 15
>go to Patong, Thailand
>somewhat famous for the 'ladyboys' (proper term there I think, very charasmatic cross dressing men, surgery and everything I think)
>they are very convincing (for me anyway)
>wasn't even sure if they were cross dressers until they spoke (deep manly voice)
>mum wants family photos with them, etc.
>stand next to them
>ladyboy poses and puts my hand on their breast
>mfw first breast I grabbed was a transvestites
I'm fine with it, but I'm definately not into cross dressing
Blurry pic related
>> No. 384527
I went to my boy's drag show and found the queens ridic hot. I am also bisexual, in the sense that I don't give much of a fuck what is between the legs though.

My fetishes are p tame biting + rough and animalistic sex. no bondage, no outfits, no scenarios, just raw and as violent as you can get while still being fun. Laughing, yes. No real fetishes here, tbh.
>> No. 384546
I don't really have many fetishes. A lot of it can be explained by saying that I just like boys. Human boys, drawn boys, boys of just about any species and variation. If it has a penis, I'm happy; if it doesn't, it can still be fun, but just doesn't thrill me the same way. If said boy is developmentally immature and has some semblance of innocence, all the better; if he's full-grown, that works, too.

I'm into furry porn when penises are involved (especially interesting ones) and in real life only for the quality of animalistic sex. I like sex loud, a little rough, and with some scratching and biting and stuff. Human sex is usually either completely repressed or completely fake; animals just do what comes naturally. I've been with a guy that was almost totally silent during sex, save for heavy breathing. Even when he had an orgasm, it was nothing, not even a grunt. That annoyed the HELL out of me, like: "Um, hey, are you even enjoying this??" I dunno. I almost always make noise, and I'm louder the better it is. The only orgasms I have that are silent (sometimes) are the third-of-the-day, rubbed-off-in-ten-minutes, I'm-bored-and-don't-even-care variety. Forgive me if I don't want to get the impression that my mate is having an orgasm of such lackluster quality after three hours of sex with me.

I have a fetish for excrement, that is: the ACT, not the SUBSTANCES. I'm okay with urine if it's being used for scent marking (in full suspension of disbelief, seeing how humans have poor senses of smell and such an activity is only done in the shower in the first place) but it doesn't really taste good so my interest ends there. Otherwise, I just like watching it come out. As for feces, I REALLY love watching it come out (who knows why -- even when I was as young as five or six I'd get boners watching or listening to other people do it) but nothing more. Any of that.. other stuff... involving scat is about as much of a turn-off as it is for most people. You might imagine finding porn that has just defecation and that doesn't also involve people rubbing it all over their bodies and/or eating it is rather difficult. Finding porn with males doing it is nearly impossible.

If such a thing even exists, I suppose I have a "love" fetish. Nothing gets me harder than cuddling with a guy who calls me "boyfriend" and promises himself exclusively to me. All the cock in the world is no comparison to just that. A shota fox cub taking a huge dump doesn't even compare to that (but seeing how getting a real boyfriend is never going to happen again, I'll take the shota fox cub, thanks!).
>> No. 384547
i have a hard time not giving bite marks to my partners. it takes a lot of self control
>> No. 384619
a girl let me indulge in that last thing i talked about. she's gonna need a lot of concealer apparently. we're not even sorry.
>> No. 384654
> I've been with a guy that was almost totally silent during sex, save for heavy breathing. Even when he had an orgasm, it was nothing, not even a grunt. That annoyed the HELL out of me, like: "Um, hey, are you even enjoying this??"

I heard from somewhere that men develop the habit of being quiet during sex when they are still boys, because as children they would masturbate as silently as possible so that nobody could hear them. Practicing this long enough just makes it become natural, and there you go. Doesn't mean he wasn't enjoying it, though I still understand why you'd prefer noises.

It seems like people generally prefer vocal, responsive partners, which makes perfect sense. I practiced ninja masturbation when I was a child and have a stoic face pretty much all the time, so I'm kinda worried that when I eventually do get laid that'll be one of the reasons I don't make a good partner. I feel like if I forced the grunts and expressions it would come off as really fake, and just make things worse.

I guess I could just start grunting whenever I masturbate, and teach myself to be noisy.
>> No. 384655
I've been told i'm way to quiet and stoic in bed but its definately not a hangover effect from "adolescant ninja masturbation" as i didn't start fapping until i was 19 and living on my own

she once said it was like fucking a warm corpse how rood
>> No. 384657
I don't think this is a fetish but I almost feel more satisfaction from getting my partner off than I do from orgasm.Orgasm's nice but I love being able to make someone else feel good.
>> No. 384658
I have a lot of fetishes, but they're all in my head. Some are doable, like fishnets, pregnancy, or lesbian (well, with me watching, I obviously couldn't partake in that.) I also have an interest in being an interchangeable sub, but the relationship would be more teacher-pupil than master-slave. In fact, as a virgin, one of my deepest monogamist fantasies is an older woman, well versed in sex, who actually gives "lessons" on both her, me, and the friction in between... But with no sexual partner they all stay in my head, so feh. :(

Of course, there are some that aren't possible at all, like futa, deep fisting (I know, I know...) or unbirthing, so my hopes/dreams aren't really dashed. (These seem pretty tame as far as the internet goes, though...)

Huh, that makes a lot of sense. I've never had a place to myself, so I also do it ninja style; of course, even wearing headphones a lot of the sounds that anyone makes in porn (homemade or otherwise) has never been that appealing to me, either.
>> No. 384659
I can relate to this. I suppose it can't be a bad thing, huh?
>> No. 384682
Kind of a weird one, but girls who aren't squeamish, kinda.
I've always liked little critters since I was little, and my family's filled with women who scream bloody murder and throw a fit at the sight of even the most non-threatening creatures like caterpillars and snails.
I've volunteered at a variety of nature parks since I was pretty young, and worked with some cool girls who had no problem handling snakes, rodents, bugs, etc. I remember crushing on them pretty hard.

But they were awesome regardless, and I'm sure I would've crushed on them no matter the circumstances.
>> No. 384704
I'm quiet too, and I agree with this

>I feel like if I forced the grunts and expressions it would come off as really fake, and just make things worse.

That's less of a fetish and more of a personality preference, isn't it?
>> No. 384731
>"adolescent ninja masturbation"

That was what he claimed it was from, also. Though, really, I think it has more to do with Western ideals of men as emotionless stoics that are always neutral, that is forced onto boys from a young age. Women also masturbate quietly as teenagers, but they are almost never totally silent during sex. The difference is: women also cry at movies, men do not unless it's like... a speech in a war movie or something; then they are allowed ONE SINGLE TEAR! nothing more. So even when a man is feeling the most powerful sensation it is possible for a human to experience, he must remain stoic, or he is breaking some rule that was brainwashed into him. It's an emotional repression, when the truth is men aren't any more naturally emotionally repressed than women are. It's merely created by society.

Anyway, I grew up like that (though I don't blame my upbringing, I'm just somewhat ass-burgers) and had to teach myself how to emote when I reached my teens. Everything is so much fucking better when I actually express myself! It's like being on ecstasy or something (just guessing -- never tried it) compared to how I used to experience things.

And if anyone gives me any shit for crying at movies, I've got an excuse: I'm gay, I'm allowed to act "like a woman".

>I guess I could just start grunting whenever I masturbate, and teach myself to be noisy.

Basically what I did in my early adulthood. Doing it when everyone is out of the house, or moan into my pillow or whatever. The orgasms literally feel better -- I can't really explain it.

>I almost feel more satisfaction from getting my partner off than I do from orgasm.

This. This! How the hell did I forget that?! YES, THIS!
>> No. 384733
How does someone stay completely silent through sex, anyway? You'd at least have to relay useful sex information, like "you're stepping on my hair" and "Put your back into it, pussy".
>> No. 384799
File 137971083931.gif?nsfw - (1.79MB , 400x328 , DOGGY SEX.gif?nsfw )
Let's just say I'm an "animal person".
>> No. 384803
>> No. 384810
Here's a question for you folks who like illustrated porn (eg. pco):

Are you most influenced by the style, the content or the characters in an image? What makes or breaks a picture for you?
>> No. 384812
For myself: In some cases I take a particular interest in a character, either for how they're drawn and/or their personality. So most anything with them is A-Okay. Even ignoring the usual nerd lust, in some cases someone may even feel an emotional bond with them (like Alyx Vance in Half Life 2) and are interested in seeing that to the next level.

In other cases, it's because drawn characters can and will do anything that you want (assuming you are the artist or are paying someone to draw for you.) So this opens entire universes of fetishes that are unrealistic/fall short in real life (f.e. inflation, large insertions/stretching, various group arrangements) or flat out impossible (futa, vore, unbirthing, fuck-through, tentacles). Some stuff possible in real life also seems extremely rare in good quality, like shemale-on-female.

An artist's style can definitely break an image (I personally hate over-emphasizing breasts, especially on a character with an already-sizable bust), but I find few artists whose style can elevate my interest in an image (only particular one that comes to mind is NinjaKitty.)

Only some of those things I listed are my fetishes.
>> No. 384815
Characters, but if I have to search for specifically drawn porn, it's probably content.

Can you explain the appeal of animals in this context?
>> No. 384838
File 137977930953.jpg?nsfw - (103.38KB , 850x680 , sample-8fab63c7316032ca3410f500e9694c56.jpg?nsfw )
Content and character, I suppose.
Honestly, when it comes to illustrated porn, I enjoy the expressions and potentially the sensuality that drawn stuff can have that is typically not found in real porn.
When it comes to real porn, I only have some softcore, as I'm unable get off to hardcore due to the fact that I can't buy how painfully fake the moaning and "orgasms" are.
So when it comes to vicariously experiencing sexuality through pornography, I find (well) drawn porn to be more satisfying.
Then again, I am a super-virgin who has never known the touch of woman, so for all I know when a chick is unconvincingly moaning "OMG YOUR COCK IS SO GOOD LOL" while making goofy faces I wouldn't associate with pleasure and then having an "orgasm" extremely quickly without any foreplay/clitoral stimulation, everything she's expressing could be heartfelt and genuine.
I still look at real women, but I prefer softcore pictures to movies, so I can let my imagination fill in the gaps. Otherwise, I guess I prefer drawn stuff, not so much because I find drawn women more appealing, but because the fantasies are more satisfying, I guess?
>> No. 384839

>prefer softcore to hardcore


I grew up fapping to softcore. It was basically all I had at the time. I didn't see my first real hardcore flick until my late teens, and while I've watched a ton of hardcore, I've never really enjoyed it as much as I enjoy softcore porn.

Oh sure, you might think it silly or stupid or whatever that I find the stuff on Skinemax more appealing than any given Gianna Michaels video, but I'm not gonna lie about which one I'd rather watch. Yes, there's a lot of goofy softcore stuff out there (which I tend to avoid), but the best stuff has a sense of eroticism and, dare I say it, romance that hardcore porn lacks.

I'm not into the kinkier/weirder hardcore stuff, and I don't even watch porn with the sound on (a holdover from my younger days), but I still don't like hardcore because of its tendency to showcase borderline-misogynistic behavior (slapping girls' tits/faces, wrapping hands around their throats) and its lack of eroticism. (That goes as much for M/F scenes as it does for F/F scenes. I don't watch hardly any M/M despite my bisexuality.) I also tend to avoid Asian-centric porn for the simple fact that women rarely look as if they enjoy the sex (I just can't get into that). The type of hardcore stuff I enjoy these days comes from places such as X-Art, which balances hardcore sensibilities with the kind of eroticism I enjoy seeing in softcore.

tl;dr — I’d rather masturbate to http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=371315194 than http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=2081625851
>> No. 384840
The only reason I really prefer softcore to hardcore is because hardcore does so many fucking closeups. Yes, she has a vagina, thank you for making sure I'm aware of it. Yes, thank you for taking up half the shot with his ass. I far prefer the full-body view, especially since a lot of my own pleasure comes from seeing their (mostly her) pleasure. (This is another reason I prefer lesbian to straight, as now there are two females in potential heights of pleasure versus one. And tits.)

But I agree on the misogyny thing: unless it's specifically targeted, like light bondage, I just can't like porn where there isn't equal interest from all parties. (Again, this goes back to getting off on their pleasure, so if the chick isn't into it then neither am I.)

Softcore titles like Skinemax are also less likely to have overly-plastic or heavily make-upped ladies...
>> No. 384843
If you don't get sex with animals right away, doubt I could explain it to you.
>> No. 384845
Content first, characters second and style last I think? Not sure.

>because of its tendency to showcase borderline-misogynistic behavior (slapping girls' tits/faces, wrapping hands around their throats)
Well shit, if it goes that way I probably shouldn't have used that word when I mentioned to a pal I draw hardcore occasionally. I must look like a fucking creep now. :/
>> No. 384847
Well, all I can come up with is that they're very active masturbation aids?
>> No. 384848

Not all hardcore porn has that sort of stuff in it. But outside of what you could call the "female-friendly" stuff you see from places such as X-Art or Viv Thomas, it seems (at least to me) that hardcore stuff is utilizing the kind of stuff I've mentioned more and more. (That doesn't even include the language used in the vast majority of porn movies, whether on-screen, on the package/description, or in the titles of movies posted on sites like Pornhub. You're more liable to see ‘whore’ or ‘slut’ that ‘woman’ on a given page.)

If you draw hardcore, great. If you draw stuff with the kind of content I described in it, I'm not gonna give you any gruff over it. This is just my personal view of porn, anyways.


>Are you most influenced by the style, the content or the characters in an image?

Typically, I’d go with content -> style -> characters in that order, but the first two can change depending on the circumstances.

There's a reason I don't have lots of Gadget porn stashed away on my hard drive any more: I raised my standards for art styles and couldn’t stand looking at all the horrible-looking crap I’d saved for years. (Really, lots of Western fanart/porn/etc. looks fucking awful.) On the flip side, there's a number of doujins out there that I’d probably love for the art style alone if they didn’t have content that made me say ‘nope’ while I sprayed holy water on my monitor.
>> No. 384849
This topic kind of relates to
It's the same deal with me; it's often obvious she isn't enjoying it at all in hardcore. Lesbian softcore all the way at least for IRL porn.
>> No. 384886
File 137990281286.jpg - (213.49KB , 900x281 , Sex is Awesome!.jpg )
You can't have misogynism between two people in a consensual sexual relationship.
>> No. 384895
i like this comic because of the seeming contradiction here

but i worry that the punchlines will escape many.
>> No. 384902
She likes degradation in an intimate setting with a partner, but not in a public setting with random people and bad rap music?
>> No. 384904
>She likes degradation in an intimate setting with a partner
p much everyone does, might be the punchline.

whoever said "treat me with all due respect in bed" was either judge dredd or on a power trip.
>> No. 384905
Probably not wise to assume "everyone" shares the same fetishes you do.
>> No. 384906
she has the power to consent to whatever fantasy, desire, roleplay, power position or whatever she wants to, even consent play, because she and her partner both own that experience together. it isn't a statement on her actual value as a human being. people don't get off on having their salaries lower than someone else's, their rights diminished, or their bodies treated as property by society. getting off in the bedroom with a partner while acting out this sort of stuff can be a way to take ownership and control over the experiences we've faced outside of it.

let me put it to you this way. a really good dom is very very hard to come by because the best doms are actually very controlled, very gentle, and yet still spontaneous, demanding, and limit pushing. they make the subs feel as used or controlled as the sub is comfortable with and create a safe space to work in to make sure that it doesn't go too far, that it isn't too dangerous, that it isn't beyond what the sub is willing to do. the dom gets pleasure out of it, but in a good dom/sub, the sub is the real focus.

that said, i get my jollies as either a dom or a sub, but i love being a dom. it's... an exquisite art to be able to create that environment for both and still be giving and protective while playing into her kinks. it's one hell of a game.
>> No. 384912
>a way to take ownership and control over the experiences we've faced outside of it
You realize not everything has to be a statement on society, right? Maybe someone just likes getting choked because it brings me to orgasm quicker?
>> No. 384913
well yeah, but in the context of the comic i'm not going to bring up how some fetishes, kinks, and potentially dangerous activities can just make sex more intense without there having to be some sort of societal influence involved. like i said. seeming contradiction. i'm focusing on that.

but if you want to keep finding holes in my argument because i didn't write an exhaustive paper with supplemental information or a self-help book for people with fetishes, please feel free to ask me more rhetorical questions.

i wasn't suggesting that everyone needs to be a social justice warrior in bed. it was an example, not a generalization.
>> No. 384916
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar

Sometimes people just like to be held down and fucked roughly.
>> No. 384928
I am not gay, but I'm pretty sure putting objects up your (assuming male) ass isn't gay.

It's only when you would significantly prefer it if there was a man on the other end of that object, then it becomes homo.
>> No. 384932
Lesbians can use vaguely phallic sex toys without being straight, so I agree that buttstuff for guys isn't gay unless you really want it to be.
>> No. 384933
I always figured whatever you ended the phrase "Deep down, I could really go for some ________" with, was your sexual preference.
>> No. 384935
So you're saying I'm a tacosexual?
>> No. 384941
chile burrito here, tacosexuals are pig disgusting
>> No. 384942
I didn't ask to be born this way!
>> No. 384946
>Lesbians can use vaguely phallic sex toys without being straight
What's up with that?
>> No. 384947
And gay men can use vagina in a cup.
masturbating is about getting it to work.
>> No. 384948
You can like dick without liking men.
>> No. 384952
Those aren't shaped like a penis, they're shaped like the inside of a vagina.
>> No. 384954
Yeah, you've just got to figure--physically speaking, the vagina and penis have co-evolved to be well suited to pleasuring one another, and the brain in both sexes has evolved to respond with excitement to the sort of stimulation provided by either. But that's purely the sense of touch that's involved--the visual, olfactory, and interpersonal sensations one gets by being with another person may be complete deal breakers. Who the thing you like is attached to matters.

Think of it this way: a lot of straight men, maybe even most straight men, like boobs. But women aren't the only ones who have boobs--fat guys have boobs, too. But most straight men would not want to feel up a fat guy just to get some boob.
>> No. 384958
File 138014834811.jpg - (8.53KB , 616x33 , image.jpg )
Although you could debate the boobs are very different themselves, I see your point. It's kinda like some of the stuff I saw in a discussion thread in U18chan (u18chan.com/board/u18chan/d/topic/1164223), where they were discussing multiple sexualities (eg. I only like girls IRL, but herm on guy furry can turn me on big time depending on artist, even though it has two dicks). It's actually a very interesting thread IMO, but be warned there is a fair chance of finding furry porn there.
>> No. 385288
Figured I'd bump with a question: How many guys here actually like to cuddle, after sex or just whenever?

It's one of the most attractive things in the world to me, but a lot of guys I talk to at school say they don't like to do it for some reason. My roommate and his girlfriend don't sleep together. Despite their heavy intimacy, after they fuck, she goes back to her room.
>> No. 385290
>a lot of guys I talk to at school say they don't like to do it for some reason

It's taboo for men to have emotions other than lust, dominance and rage, so they might just be too embarrassed of their fondness of cuddling to admit it.

I'm a guy and I spend about as much time fantasizing about cuddling as I do about sex. Sex without an intense cuddle session afterwards just sounds kind of pointless to me.

But then I've never had sex and I've never cuddled with anyone so what do I know, maybe cuddling will actually suck and I'll hate it.
>> No. 385294
Cuddling isn't so bad once you get to it, but that means after the sex, i.e. I'm not there to cuddle necessarily, but once she's come and I've come then, yeah, cuddling or whatever is fine. The last girl I was with, we almost spent longer with me just stroking her hair while we had pillow talk.

Most guys are much more concerned with A) getting to the fucking and B) once you're in the fucking, making sure she cums at least once before you do, because those are more difficult to achieve. A lot of less robust gentlemen will nut and then pass out, as well, not really caring for the ladys' pleasure, which means no cuddling anyway and likely no second date (or 3rd or whatever). For a lot of guys, the marathon of just getting your ponos in her vagoo is such that I'm not surprised most guys don't concern themselves with cuddling. Cuddling is really easy and even kind of nice if you really like the girl once you're done fucking, but it isn't always necessary.

As for your roommate and his gf, the thing about cuddling and sleeping together that most people don't realize is that it's actually kind of difficult to keep cuddling and fall asleep together after sex. If your partner is laying on top of your arm it can cut off blood flow to the limb. The body heat of both of you can easily be sweltering, preventing sleep on summer nights. Tossing and turning can hit your partners face or inadvertently cut off oxygen, and you actually need to toss and turn a bit to get to sleep, so having someone lay on you or spoon with you actually hinders that. Cuddling is very nice after sex, but literally sleeping together is a lot harder and not as idyllic as most people seem to think it is, and apparently there is some research that says that you get a much sounder sleep if you do not sleep in the same bed as your partner. So yeah, it might seem like cuddling gets a bad rep but, it's not as great as it's made out to be.
>> No. 385300
>How many guys here actually like to cuddle, after sex or just whenever?

I like to cuddle all the damn time. I like it more than actual sex, in many ways. My entire body is erogenous, from head to toe, so I find rubbing completely against someone is much more pleasurable than just focusing on the genitals.

Also, I mostly just like sex for the feeling of warmth and closeness. If I want to cum, I can do that by myself and much better.
>> No. 385373
Ugg where do I go with this. I've developed a variety of kinks from body worship, asking permission to cum, cross dressing, hair pulling and extremely light breath play(not me personally but most of the girls I've been with ) and on top of that being able to switch with all of the previous mentioned kinks(usually bottom heavy but working on top lately).

but its weird, it took me years of experimenting to determine what exactly I'm looking for sexually but I'm still extremely shy about talking about my kinks, even typing this out requires a bit of effort. but in a setting where I know everyone is kinky, like a munch, I'm more open about it. I separated my vanilla life and kink life for such a long time that its now hard for me to reconcile both.
>> No. 385376
Good taste, I approve.
Cuddling's the bomb.
>> No. 385401
I think I would like cuddling.
>> No. 385407
I fidget too much to really cuddle. I can power hug and scoop people up into my arms and dance and wrestle, but I cannot hold still.
>> No. 385431
File 138154981549.jpg - (0.99MB , 1200x1718 , 5.jpg )
Kinda weird, but I've always found nun attire extremely attractive.
My relationship with Christianity has fluctuated over the years--I was born and raised very devout. I have since become an atheist, for various reasons. My fetish for nun habits has remained a constant throughout my life however, regardless of where I stood in relation to the faith.
I'm also not the kind of guy who gets turned on by the idea of something being taboo/forbidden or naughty.
Not sure where it stems from. Maybe I just find it cute. Maybe I had a crush on Julie Andrews as a kid watching the Sound of Music and it's some kind of subconscious association or something.
>> No. 385496
File 138162274341.jpg - (167.45KB , 720x384 , 2483815054_be0122356d_o.jpg )
>> No. 385521
File 138169626817.png - (593B , 36x26 , catlean.png )
my fetish is being a jerk
>> No. 385522
>"Do you have any fetishes?"
>> No. 385524
"Tell me I'm sexy"
"Are you calling me a liar?"
type jerk, or
"Go suck a box of dicks, hey, I happen to have my dick in a box right now" type jerk
>> No. 385525
>> No. 385527
File 138170099837.jpg - (31.06KB , 1020x1059 , 239.jpg )
See this things? They are called ankle braces. Or ankle bands. Also, ankle supports.

And they are my secret fetish. For whatever reason, seeing a woman wering these (or any sort of footwear that leaves both the ankle and the toes uncovered) turns on the I MUST FUCK switch in my brain.

It is not even a foot fetish, as just bare feet don't do crap for me.
>> No. 385531
File 138170328070.jpg - (22.46KB , 630x365 , 00000nun-more-bold-630-75.jpg )
I like the cut of yer jib.
>> No. 385566
File 138185201888.jpg - (28.04KB , 364x400 , sexy-nun.jpg )
Mah brothers.
>> No. 385570
Because feet are beautiful (like all the parts of a female body) and that thing brings attention to the right lines?
>> No. 385576
File 138187053966.png - (364.77KB , 782x813 , http%3A%2F%2Fimagescale_tumblr_com%2Fimage%2F1280%.png )
Almost forgot.
>> No. 385590
>My roommate and his girlfriend don't sleep together. Despite their heavy intimacy, after they fuck, she goes back to her room.
Might be for convenience, or because they want to keep their relationship on the DL.

It's not normal for sure, only two reasons not to cuddle:
1. Convenience (ie "I have to go to work, you go back to sleep baby")
2. No emotional attachment (fuckbuddy, sociopath or prostitute)

Same reason heels are attractive. They make the woman look like she's arching her foot, which is what most women do during a proper orgasm.

It's sexually suggestive etc.
>> No. 385594
>Same reason heels are attractive. They make the woman look like she's arching her foot, which is what most women do during a proper orgasm.

Heels are designed to alter a woman's posture so her actual sexual parts (boobs and butt) become more prominent. A fetish is called a fetish for a reason; there is nothing inherently or naturally sexual about feet.
>> No. 385596
True, but one line of thinking on why foot fetishes have become so prominent in recent years is because of the tendency for movies to cut away from nude characters to provide modesty, but show bare feet--thus, bare feet come to represent nudity in and of themselves.

It's a fetish, as you said--the body part itself is not sexual. But it's understandable how the media can bring about the conditioning that leads to feet becoming sexualized.
>> No. 385604
I can't be a cute femboy unless there are ways to make yourself shorter. I'm fucking 6'2".
>> No. 385608
Do so over a webcam and use perspective. Buy oversized everything for a backdrop to the webcam to make you seem smaller in comparison.
>> No. 385615
I can only presume that an obvious course of action is to look at what tall girls do to look cute.
>> No. 385618
It is when you masturbate to it.
>> No. 385621
>there are ways to make yourself shorter
Since the trunk of the body is similar for short or tall people cosmetic surgery does exist where sections of femur tibia and fibula are gradually removed.
>> No. 385657
That's messed up, no one should ever do that. Just accept the fact that you're tall, it comes in handy for many things.

a short person
84 posts omitted. First 100 shown. [Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]

Delete post []
Report post